Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Wing-nuts call for a coup.......

Yeah, just when things couldn't get more excited here in Kentucky, you have these nutcases 'softly' reminding their readers that if there was a military coup, it would take care of everything!


You know...... I seem to remember something like this being suggested once before.... now when was that?

Wasn't it during FDR's administration?

Yeah anyhow, here's a link to the article (Newsmax took it down)

By: John L. Perry Article Font Size

There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America’s military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the “Obama problem.” Don’t dismiss it as unrealistic.

America isn’t the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn’t mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes:

Officers swear to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to “obey the orders of the president of the United States.”

Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized.

They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office.

They can see that the economy — ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation — is financially reliant on foreign lender governments.

They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.

They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America’s troop strength is allowed to sag.

They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.

They can see the nation’s safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.
So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do?

Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan’s arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?

Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran’s nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World?

What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, “I’m not interested in victory”) that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse?

Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims?

Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America’s military leadership is lost in a fool’s fog.

Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a “family intervention,” with some form of limited, shared responsibility?

Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making.

Military intervention is what Obama’s exponentially accelerating agenda for “fundamental change” toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama’s radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible.

Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don’t shrug and say, “We can always worry about that later.”

In the 2008 election, that was the wistful, self-indulgent, indifferent reliance on abnegation of personal responsibility that has sunk the nation into this morass.

John L. Perry, a prize-winning newspaper editor and writer who served on White House staffs of two presidents, is a regular columnist for Newsmax.com. Read John Perry's columns here.

© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Want to see something funn... I mean..... well just check this out.


Go to Google, type in "mongiardo kentucky" hit enter and select the 'news' icon at the top.





Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Obama's War in Afghanistan



Thanks Joe!

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

If you think healthcare companies give a damn about the people they insure, you might want to watch this.......

Yeah...... and people are seriously afraid of 'death panels'? Are you serious?!



Wait...... you mean they deny people coverage who're pregnant and have acne? No........

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at UK discussing renewable energy.

Robert Kennedy Jr. at UK pt. 1



Robert Kennedy Jr. at UK pt. 2



Robert Kennedy Jr. at UK pt. 3



Robert Kennedy Jr. at UK pt. 4

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

So, I used to be a Bush Republican...........

Yeah, up until 2004. I just stumbled over some points I made in a poly sci class when I was attending NKU.

Here they are.......

---------------------------------------------------------------
2/5/2003

Iraqi policies.

*ENVIRONMENTAL
-Set oil wells on fire
-Released oil into the sea

*SOVERIGNTY
-Invaded Kuwait in 1990

*TERRORISM
-Launched scud missiles into Saudi Arabia, and Israel
-Prepared suicide squads to act in Israel
-U.S. evidence that Iraq is funding terrorism

*MURDER
-Gassed Iranian people
-Gassed Kurds
-Killed opposition when coming to power
-Used civilians in Gulf War as human shields

*POINTS
-If not sooner then later we’ll deal with him.
-Appeasement didn’t work in 1939.
-Has Chem. weapons, trying to develop nuclear
-Weapons inspectors given run around
-French are unsupportive due to oil to their country
(a gross violation due to the embargo they signed)
(fear of terrorist action within their country to due security)
-Political opposition die under Saddam, everyone has right to freedom
-War is one of liberation
-War is one of security for U.S.
-War would stabilize region

*DOMESTIC/FOREIGN SUPPORT
(D)
-Democrats attempting to reenact the draft even though a draft is entirely unneeded to draw support away from the president.
(F)
-Russia was not supportive due to the multi-billion dollar debt in military supplies the Russians supplied under Soviet rule
-Europe opposed due to biased one sided-unbalanced media.
-France opposed due to oil

*CONCLUSION
-War is inevitable
-Iraq like Afghanistan will be grateful
-Casualties will be light (Gulf War casualties were 240, 776 wounded against the fourth largest army in the world in 1990)
-If not acted upon pacifists and appeasers are no better than the people that sat under Adolph Hitler and did nothing
-Good and evil does exist in the world and curse those who wouldn’t act to help another human being be free.

---------------------------------------------------------------

::::SLAPS FOREHEAD::::

Billionaires for 'Wealthcare'

God hates poor people, that's why they don't deserve healthcare.

Friday, September 11, 2009

Ok, so, did you know that Obama is going to kill your grandparents and create his own army? Well it's on youtube, you know it must be true.